Why would you prefer chromium-browser in sid over google-chrome

I’ve seen a lot of Debian user asking:  ”What is the difference between chromium-browser in sid and google-chrome (stable)?”, “Does chromium-browser support html5, h264, vp8?”

“Why would I prefer chromium-browser in sid over google-chrome (stable)?”

  • chromium-browser is free software, google-chrome isn’t
  • chromium-browser uses (when it is possible) system libs.
  • chromium-browser supports, like google-chrome, the h264 codec (and chromium official builds don’t support it)
  • chromium-browser in sid follows the stable tree, but it contains some important (features and bugfix) backports, as for example VP8/WebM codecs (the stable google-chrome version doesn’t support it),  or the  support for “Ambiance/Radiance and Dust themes button”
  • chromium-browser uses a very recent and high-performance libv8 version, google-chrome (stable) uses an ancient version

BTW, the next step is to get chromium-browser into testing and upload a dev version (6.x) in experimental.

Popularity: 10% [?]

Related posts:

  1. chromium-browser removed from testing
  2. Chromium ready for unstable

  • p

    Also, google chrome is spyware.

  • http://asdasdasda p

    Also, google chrome is spyware.

  • http://www.register-web-domain.in website domain registration

    I am also have this doubt. Now it is clear. Thank you for sharing this information.